Legal Opinion

United States v. Kukilani

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided May 2, 1916Published

Indictment: On objection to testimony.

1Opinion of the CourtClemons, J.

In this prosecution, under one indictment, of the alleged participants in adultery,the government offers as a witness the husband of the female defendant, to prove marriage, — not as against the wife, however, but only as against the other defendant, her alleged paramour.

The attorney for the defense objects on the ground that the incompetency of one spouse to testify against the other under the common law and under the Revised Laws of Hawaii, 1915, sec. 2613, renders such testimony as is here offered inadmissible, so long as the other spouse remains one of the defendants in the case.

The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bassett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
  3. People v. FowlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Commonwealth v. BinghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  5. Graves v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API