Ensworth v. Albin
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to Fifth District Court. Points of counsel are sufficiently set out in tbe opinion of court. cited State ex rel. Ensworth v. Albin, 44 Mo. 346; City of St. Louis v.' Teifel, 42 Mo. 578; State v. Mathews, 44 Mo. 523 ; State ex ret. Weir v. County Judge, 2 Iowa, 280 ; 37 Mo. 330 ; 2 Conn. 490 ; 38 Mo. 209 ; 25 Mo. 125 ; 21 Penn. 147; 15 Iowa, 305; 4 Dale, 14; 41 Mo. 224-30.
1Opinion of the Court
CüRitiBR, Judge,
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is a proceeding by writ of mandamus to compel the County Court judges of Buchanan county to issue to the relator a commission as judge of the Common Pleas Court of that county, and is, as respects its subject-matter and the parties, identical with a former suit by the State, upon the relation of Ensworth, against the same respondents, reported in 44 Mo. 346. It was *452held in that proceeding that the special election, under which the relator claims, was unauthorized and invalid, and that the relator consequently acquired no rights under or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Morrison v. SpringerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
- State ex rel. Ensworth v. AlbinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. MullinixSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
- State ex rel. Hamilton v. EverettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873