Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Farmers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 26, 1998No. 16621-0-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, C.J.

Farmers Insurance Company reinstated Mary Reynolds’s automobile insurance policy effective after an accident involving her car. Farmers then sent her the reinstatement policy with an effective time prior to the accident. After Farmers notified Ms. Reynolds that the time on the reinstatement was incorrect and sent her a corrected policy, she sued for coverage. The trial court granted her motion for summary judgment and Farmers appeals, contending Ms. Reynolds had no coverage at the time of her accident and that the reinstatement policy should be reformed based on a unilateral mistake. We…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In re the Marriage of SchweitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Matter of Marriage of SchweitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Geoghegan v. DeverWashington Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. GLEPCO, LLC v. ReinstraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Reynolds v. Farmers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  3. Silves v. KingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. Syrett v. Reisner McEwin & AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Seattle Pump Co. v. Traders & General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API