Legal Opinion

Syrett v. Reisner McEwin & Associates

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 30, 2001No. 46694-1-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Becker, A.C.J.

A time limit provision in a marine survey contract excluded liability unless the customer gave notice of a claim within 90 days and filed suit within six months of the completion of the survey. The customer discovered concealed dry rot in his boat 18 months after the survey and filed suit against the surveyor 7 months after that. The trial court dismissed the suit on summary judgment. We affirm. The contractual notice and claim filing provision was a reasonable limitation on liability, given the object of the contract, because it allowed the customer sufficient time to ascertain…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Queen of the PacificSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Hwang v. McMahillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. Hwang v. McMahillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Absher Construction Co. v. Kent School District No. 415Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Nuhome Investments, LLC v. WellerWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Mattingly v. Palmer Ridge Homes LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. Mattingly v. Palmer Ridge Homes, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. EPIC, a non-profit corporation v. CliftonLarsonAllen LLPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  5. Syrett v. Reisner McEwin & AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API