Legal Opinion
Venclauskas v. State of Connecticut, Dept. of Public Safety Division of State Police
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 17, 1995No. Civil 3:95CV00373 (AVC)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
COVELLO, District Judge.
This is an action, inter alia, for declaratory, injunctive and other equitable relief brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. (“ADA”), the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (“Rehabilitation Act”). The defendant has filed the within motion to dismiss the ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The issues are: 1) whether the complaint has alleged with sufficient particularity that the plaintiff is an “individual…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Lyle S. Chandler and Adolphus A. Maddox, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. The City of Dallas, the City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kalekiristos v. CTS Hotel Management Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Weigert v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Sicard v. City of Sioux CityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996
- Wilson v. Pennsylvania State Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Lajeunesse v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO., INC.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.