Knight Iron & Metal Co. v. Ardis
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
We take the facts recited by the Court of Appeals, and consider none not so stated. From them-we note the following:
This is an action for damages on account of personal injuries inflicted by one Holmes, alleged to be acting in the line and scope of his authority as the servant of petitioner. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the lower court, and appellant has applied to us for certiorari.
There was no general strike in petitioner’s plant, but “some two dozen or so” of its employees did so. Their places were filled by putting others in them. This created high feeling…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Linnehan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Miller-Brent Lumber Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Bullard v. Cullman Heading Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barrett Mobile Home Transport, Inc. v. McGuginCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- State, Department of Revenue v. Kelly Supply Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980