Legal Opinion

Federal Glass Co. v. Federal Glass Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided February 21, 1952No. Civ. A. 1264PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, Chief Judge.

This is an action for unfair competition to restrain defendant from using its corporate name. As there is no conflict on any material fact, both parties have moved for summary judgment.

Plaintiff has been an Ohio corporation since March 29, 1904 under the name of “The Federal Glass Company”. It manufactures glass products such as tumblers, dinner and kitchen ware, jugs, etc. Its main place of business is in Columbus Ohio; it sells its products throughout the United States, incuding the District of Columbia. For practically half a century plaintiff has sold its products under…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Black & Yates, Inc. v. Mahogany Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  4. Federal Telephone & Radio Corp. v. Federal Television Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  5. National Fruit Product Co. v. Dwinell-Wright Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The American Plan Corporation v. State Loan & Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  2. Federal Glass Co. v. LoshinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API