Legal Opinion

Estate of Joseph L. Haskins, Deceased, Lloyd L. Edwards and Jayne C. Haskins, Executors v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1966No. 20269_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELY, Circuit Judge:

This appeal is from a District Court decision in favor of the Government in an action for refund of federal estate taxes. The action was instituted by taxpayer under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) (1) (1964). The District Court’s Findings of Fact and Opinion are reported at 240 F.Supp. 492 (N.D.Cal.1965). Taxpayer properly invokes our jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1964).

At issue is the propriety of inclusion in the decedent’s gross estate of $185,560, the value of a trust created incident to a division, by agreement, of community property. In 1947, the decedent, Joseph L.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Howard Past, of the Estate of Edna C. Rosedale Ogg, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  2. Estate of Carl J. Guenzel, Deceased, Ernest Usher Guenzel and Carl Stanley Guenzel, Executors v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  3. Orlando Valdez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. HASKINS'ESTATE v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. A. Frederic Leopold and Walter A. Keane, as Executors of the Estate of Hans G. M. De Schulthess, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Puchner v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API