Legal Opinion

Orlando Valdez v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 18, 1963No. 18737_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge.

In this action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (b) and §§ 2671 et seq., appellant seeks damages for injuries sustained through the alleged negligence of a government employee in the operation of an automobile. Trial before the district court without a jury resulted in judgment for the United States.

Upon appeal from that judgment appellant contends that we should hold clearly erroneous the court’s findings that the government driver was free from negligence and that appellant was guilty of negligence.

We may assume, arguendo, that the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nickey v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Trade Development Bank v. The Continental Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. Crabtree v. MeasdayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Bankers Multiple Line Insurance Co. v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Needle v. LowenbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API