Legal Opinion

People v. Conover

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1966No. Crim. 5299PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P. J.

A jury found defendant guilty of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496). He appeals 1 from the judgment of conviction.

In the early part of 1964 Gorman Rose, who was employed as a driver of a cement mixer, accidentally met defendant with whom he had first become acquainted seven to nine years before. They stopped to talk and in the course of the conversation the subject of “chain saws” arose. Defendant told Rose that he “frequently” had the opportunity to obtain such saws and asked him “if I do [obtain them], would you be interested in some?” Rose replied that he would be interested…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. LoveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. People v. KirkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. People v. RosotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. People v. GarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. State v. ToppiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  4. People v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. People v. SantosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API