Legal Opinion · Dissent

Springdale Board of Education v. Bowman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 7, 1987No. 87-147Published

1DissentJohn I. Purtle, Justice

It appears to me the majority opinion is an attempt to restore authority in the chancery courts to issue writs of mandamus. This Court ended such authority in the case of Nethercutt v. Pulaski County Special School District, 248 Ark. 143, 450 S.W.2d 777 (1970). There the school board had declined to renew the contract of Nethercutt and he filed suit in chancery seeking a “mandatory injunction” directing the school board to execute and deliver his contract for the current year. He also sought a writ of mandamus restoring him to his former position and ordering the board to pay his back salary.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Safferstone v. TuckerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  2. Chandler v. Perry-Casa Public Schools District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Springdale School District v. JamesonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Nethercutt v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  5. Lewis v. ConleeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API