Prinzo ex rel. Puleo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DOWNEY, Judge.
This appeal arises from a final order dismissing the appellants’ complaint with prejudice pursuant to the appellee’s motion to dismiss alleging failure to state a cause of action. The motion to dismiss asserted that the appellants were not entitled to personal injury protection or uninsured motorist benefits under their automobile policy, for injuries sustained by Prinzo, a pedestrian, because the alleged tortfeasor was operating a moped, which the legislature has excluded from the classification of motor vehicles.
With reference to personal injury protection benefits, section…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hansen v. Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LinkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Velez v. Criterion Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1984
3Cited by2 opinions
- CRANE RENTAL OF ORLANDO v. HausmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Lane v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985