Legal Opinion

CRANE RENTAL OF ORLANDO v. Hausman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 31, 1987No. 86-1327PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

518 So.2d 395 (1987)

CRANE RENTAL OF ORLANDO, Inc., Appellant,

v.

Ford S. HAUSMAN, Appellee.

No. 86-1327.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

December 31, 1987.

Charles Evans Davis of Fishback, Davis, Dominick & Bennett, Orlando, for appellant.

Steven R. Bechtel, Orlando, and Law Offices of Gaylord A. Wood, Jr., Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.

ORFINGER, Judge.

Crane Rental appeals from a final judgment in which the trial court found that its self-propelled cranes were not motor vehicles, as defined by Florida law, and therefore subject to ad valorem taxes. We affirm.

Crane Rental (Crane)…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Volusia County v. DAYTONA BEACH RACING, ETC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1976
  2. M.J.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. Adams Construction Equipment Co. v. HausmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Forbes v. Bushnell Steel Construction Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1954
  5. Nolan-Peeler Motors, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crane Rental of Orlando, Inc. v. HausmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. SCOTT & JOBALIA CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. v. Halifax Paving, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Schultz v. Amica Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. Auto-Owners Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  5. Scott & Jobalia Construction Co. v. Halifax Paving, Inc. ex rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API