Legal Opinion
United States v. Idaho
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 2, 2000No. Nos. 98-35831, 98-35847PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
At issue in this case is the ownership of submerged lands lying within the present-day boundaries of the Coeur d’Alene Indian Reservation, which was originally set aside by executive order in 1873. After a nine-day trial involving multiple expert and lay witnesses, extensive written reports, scientific studies, and historical documents, the district court issued a lengthy and meticulous decision in which it concluded that the United States retained these submerged lands for the benefit of the Coeur d’Alene Indian Tribe (the “Tribe”). The court thus entered an order…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Alaska Pacific Fisheries v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Utah Division of State Lands v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hosaka v. United Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Motorola, Inc., a Corporation Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Federal Express Corporation, and Kuehne & Nagel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- New York v. Shinnecock Indian NationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- United States v. Confederated Tribes of Colville Indian ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Kuang v. U.S. Dep't of Def.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.