Legal Opinion
Schul v. Sherard
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 24, 2000No. C-3-98-217PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #30); JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, Chief Judge.
This litigation stems from the Plaintiffs placement on administrative leave, from his position as a high school track coach, for allegedly advocating the use of caffeine as a performance-enhancing substance. After receiving a complaint that the Plaintiff had suggested the usé of caffeine pills, or another form of Caffeine, to one or more of his student-athletes, Defendant Eric Ely, the Principal of the school…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Equity in Athletics, Inc. v. Department of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2009
- Jefferson v. Jefferson County Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2002