Legal Opinion

In re Shaw

Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania

Decided July 18, 2018No. 5 JD 16PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY JUDGE JEFFREY P. MINEHART

I. INTRODUCTION

Respondent Magisterial District Judge Michael G. Shaw (Respondent Shaw) has been accused of judicial misconduct by the Judicial Conduct Board in a Complaint filed on November 1, 2016, and by Ian Amended Complaint filed on July 14, 2017. Discovery was completed and then a pretrial conference was held on December 7, 2017.

Subsequently, the parties agreed to Joint Stipulations of Fact in Lieu of Trial and a Waiver of Trial Pursuant to C.J.D.R.P. No. 502(D)(1).

Respondent Shaw's improper conduct spanned the recent adoption of the New Rules…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re RocaCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. In re SegalCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. In Re MurphyCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. In re CioppaCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. In re SullivanCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re ShawCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API