Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Conlon
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Atchison district, court; Benjamin F. Hudson, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
This is the second appearance of this case here. The general facts are stated in Railway Co. v. Conlon, 62 Kan. 416, 63 Pac. 432. The propositions there considered and decided were the right to a farm crossing by virtue of adverse user and possession and from the necessity of the case. Before the second trial the pleadings were amended and the defendants tendered a single new issue — that the crossing was taken into consideration by the condemnation commission in making the original award of damages for the railroad *325right of way. At the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ConlonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- Adams v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kininmonth v. CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Rupley v. FraserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Hughes v. VosslerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Fryer v. CampbellWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
- Platts v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.