Legal Opinion

F. W. Woolworth & Co. v. Zimmerman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 26, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBodiiste, J.

Prosecutor seeks to review three judgments for rent for the months of July, August and September, 1934, respectively. The actions were based upon an obligation to pay as holdover tenants in certain premises in Union City, New Jersey. The actions were simultaneously brought on September 12th, 1934, a separate suit for each month’s rent. On that date, all the rentals had accrued but no motion to dismiss, because the aggregate of the rentals exceeded the jurisdiction of the court, was made until after the judgments were rendered.

That an action could have been brought as each installment accrued…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Red Top Taxicab Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  2. Kaufman v. SmathersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Faherty v. BraneganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. Philadelphia Record Co.New Jersey Circuit Court · 1946
  2. White v. GiffordMonmouth County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API