Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hartman

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1955PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames C. O’Brien, J.

Petitioner is a barber by trade and for some years past carried on Ms occupation in a frame building located in the city of Geneva on the west side of Copeland Avenue at its intersection with Hamilton Street (No. 342 Hamilton St.). Until the common council enacted a new zoning law on December 31, 1953, petitioner was allowed to operate Ms barbershop at that location although the area was zoned for residential use. So far as it appears petitioner never owned, and does not now own, any land on the west side of Copeland Avenue. However, he does own a home diagonally across the street from the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matter of Otto v. SteinhilberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  2. Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brechner v. INC. VIL. OF LAKE SUCCESSSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
  2. Albini v. StancoNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Pelham Jewish Center v. Board of TrusteesNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Paliotto v. CohalanNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Brechner v. Incorporated Village of Lake SuccessNew York Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API