Legal Opinion

In Re Shama's Estate

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 26, 1954No. 48485PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, C. J.

— Plaintiff filed her claim in probate against the executor of her deceased husband’s estate upon a promissory note for $22,000 payable to her, purporting to be signed by decedent. The answer denies that: the signature to the note is genuine, the note was given for a valid consideration, and it was delivered. Trial resulted in verdict and judgment for plaintiff. The executor has appealed.

I. The jury was instructed plaintiff was entitled to recover if she proved by a preponderance of the' evidehce the signature to the note was genuine. The trial court ruled that delivery of the note was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rule v. CareySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. In Re Estate of WorkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Robson v. BarnettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  4. Chismore v. ChismoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. Smith v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hamdorf v. CorrieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. Cox v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  3. Blakely v. BatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  4. Brose v. INTERNATIONAL MILLING COMPANYSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  5. First National Bank in Fort Lauderdale v. HuntDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API