Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Locatelli

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 2007No. 29,508PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

{1} This matter comes before the Court on a petition for discipline filed by the Judicial Standards Commission (the Commission). As grounds for recommending discipline, the Commission states that a majority of the Commissioners determined that: (1) Judge Locatelli (Respondent) improperly issued criminal contempt complaints to two attorneys, Marcia Milner and Richard Jacquez, for their role in an appeal from his court; and (2) he improperly failed to recuse himself from the contempt proceedings. We deny the petition for discipline because the Commission has failed to prove willful…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Matter of EdensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Matter of BufordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. State v. BallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State Ex Rel. Taylor v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re Robert Matthew BristolNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. AdonisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Chapman v. VarelaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re GriegoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In the Matter of RodellaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. GrovesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API