In the Matter of Locatelli
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
{1} This matter comes before the Court on a petition for discipline filed by the Judicial Standards Commission (the Commission). As grounds for recommending discipline, the Commission states that a majority of the Commissioners determined that: (1) Judge Locatelli (Respondent) improperly issued criminal contempt complaints to two attorneys, Marcia Milner and Richard Jacquez, for their role in an appeal from his court; and (2) he improperly failed to recuse himself from the contempt proceedings. We deny the petition for discipline because the Commission has failed to prove willful…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Matter of EdensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Matter of BufordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- State v. BallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Taylor v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Robert Matthew BristolNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- State v. AdonisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- Chapman v. VarelaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re GriegoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- In the Matter of RodellaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. GrovesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.