Cusano v. Klein
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
MATZ, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs second, third, fourth, fifth, ninth, and tenth claims for breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, constructive fraud, negligent misrepresentation, conversion, and imposition of constructive trust. For the reasons elaborated below, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. 1
MOTION STANDARDS
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c) provides for summary judgment when “the pleadings, depositions,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dallas & Lashmi, Inc. v. 7-Eleven, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Fredianelli v. JenkinsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Cusano v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Cusano v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Stewart v. First California Bank CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2013