Legal Opinion
Piech v. Arthur Andersen & Co., SC
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 7, 1994No. 93 C 3801PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZAGEL, District Judge.
Hanna T. Piech filed suit against Arthur Andersen & Co., S.C., (“AASC”) and Arthur Andersen & Co. (“AA & Co.”) alleging Title VII violations, breach of contract, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. 1 AA & Co. moved to dismiss the complaint. In response, Piech filed a brief in opposition and an amended complaint. The defendants now collectively move to dismiss portions of the amended complaint for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 2
A plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ernest L. Crady v. Liberty National Bank and Trust Company of Indiana, Steve Richards, Branch Administrator, and Jack Ragland, Chief Executive OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Duldulao v. Saint Mary of Nazareth Hospital CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- McGrath v. FaheyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- James JOHNSON and Benjamin White, Appellants, v. BUNNY BREAD COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Arthur Oates v. Discovery Zone, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Vickers v. Abbott LaboratoriesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Vandeventer v. Wabash National Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
- Patterson Ex Rel. Patterson v. Xerox Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Harvey v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1997
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.