AMERCO v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge.
We must address a question that we have never explicitly addressed: whether a district court has jurisdiction to enjoin an ongoing unfair labor practices hearing when one party asserts that it has not been accorded all the process it is due. Because the answer is squarely controlled by Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 303 U.S. 41, 58 S.Ct. 459, 82 L.Ed. 638 (1938), we affirm the district court’s order dismissing the Appellants’ motion for a preliminary injunction based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction. In accordance with Myers and all of our sister circuits…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. MCorp Financial, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Amerco v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006