Tanner v. Board of Appeals
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
On the critical issue of when the board of appeals had filed its decision with the town clerk, the pleadings were in conflict and it was error to allow the motion of the plaintiffs for judgment on the pleadings.
Ronald B. Tanner and Dorothy Tanner, the plaintiffs, applied for a special permit to operate a family day care home (the term is defined in G. L. c. 28A, § 9) in their residence at 198 Washington Street, Belmont. Under § 3.3 of the zoning by-law of Belmont, a special permit was required for a family day care home. Compare G. L. c. 40A, § 3, as amended by St. 1987, c. 191, which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Minaya v. Massachusetts Credit Union Share Ins. Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Building Inspector of Attleboro v. Attleboro LandfillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Elder Care Services, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Clarke v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ritchie v. Department of State PoliceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Cameron v. DivirgilioMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- S & H Petroleum Corp. v. Register of DeedsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Carr v. Entercom Boston, LLCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2007
- Geier v. Town of BarreMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.