Legal Opinion

Tanner v. Board of Appeals

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 24, 1989No. 88-P-840PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On the critical issue of when the board of appeals had filed its decision with the town clerk, the pleadings were in conflict and it was error to allow the motion of the plaintiffs for judgment on the pleadings.

Ronald B. Tanner and Dorothy Tanner, the plaintiffs, applied for a special permit to operate a family day care home (the term is defined in G. L. c. 28A, § 9) in their residence at 198 Washington Street, Belmont. Under § 3.3 of the zoning by-law of Belmont, a special permit was required for a family day care home. Compare G. L. c. 40A, § 3, as amended by St. 1987, c. 191, which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Minaya v. Massachusetts Credit Union Share Ins. Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Building Inspector of Attleboro v. Attleboro LandfillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Elder Care Services, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  4. Clarke v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. Department of State PoliceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  2. Cameron v. DivirgilioMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  3. S & H Petroleum Corp. v. Register of DeedsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  4. Carr v. Entercom Boston, LLCMassachusetts Superior Court · 2007
  5. Geier v. Town of BarreMassachusetts Superior Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API