Legal Opinion
Shelton v. Statewide Grievance Committee
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 5, 2004No. AC 24584PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*441 Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, the statewide grievance committee (committee), appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the appeal by the plaintiff, Adam J. Shelton, from the reprimand issued by the committee. On appeal, the committee claims that the court improperly determined that the record before it was insufficient to support the committee’s conclusion that the plaintiff violated rule 8.4 (3)1 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.2 We reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following facts and procedural history. The plaintiff is an attorney…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Somers v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Lewis v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Suarez v. SordoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Sheridan v. DesmondConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shelton v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Ansell v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Shelton v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Chief Disciplinary Counsel v. BurbankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Saggese v. Beazley Co. RealtorsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.