Crawford v. Euclid National Bank
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentCelebrezze, C.J.
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s “return to the thrilling days of yesteryear.” “Recently, this court set forth in succinct clarity the three necessary elements of malicious prosecution in the per curiam opinion of Border City S. & L. Assn. v. Moan (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 65. We observed that in order to prove the tort of malicious prosecution, ‘[i]t will be incumbent upon appellant to establish that these lawsuits were instituted maliciously, without probable cause, and, as a general rule, were terminated in appellant’s favor.’ Id. at 66.” Kelly v. Whiting (1985), 17 Ohio St. 3d 91,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Publix Drug Co. v. Breyer Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Schwartz v. SchwartzIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
- Lyddon v. ShawAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.