Heinitz v. Darmstadt
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Frank Darmstadt, from part of an order of the County Court of Kings county, entered in the office of the clerk of said county on the 28th day of June, 1910, resettling a case on appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Burr, J.:
The trial of this action in the County Court of Kings county resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were settled and signed by the trial judge in accordance with the provisions of section 1022 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and the defendant appellant seasonably submitted his requests for findings of fact and rulings upon questions of laws which were passed upon and filed as required by section-1023 of the said Code. Thereafter an appeal from the judgment was taken to this court. Oil March fourteenth a proposed case on appeal was served; on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bohlen v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- McManus v. Western Assurance Co. of TorontoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Smith v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
3Cited by9 opinions
- Herpe v. . HerpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Trustees of Masonic Hall & Asylum Fund v. FontanaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917
- Clancy v. . N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Miltenberg & Samton, Inc. v. FalkinghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Hanbury v. Metropolitan Securities Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.