Legal Opinion

Hanbury v. Metropolitan Securities Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, P. J.

The order appealed from, while it “ sets aside ” the former order of the court, does not in terms direct- that the verdict be set aside, but it contains a recital that the trial justice has “ handed down an opinion holding, among other things, that the ends of justice will best be served by setting aside the direction of the verdict in favor of the plaintiff with exception to plaintiff and reconsidering on this reargument the defendant’s motion to dismiss at the close of the entire case and denying the same -with exceptions to defendant and ordering a new trial.” But, as I have suggested, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Herpe v. . HerpeNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Bohlen v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Heath v. New York Building Loan Banking Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Matter of B., W. and N. Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Donnelly v. McArdleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. Ross-Ketchum Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. In re Pennsylvania & Newark RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  3. Picone v. PiconeNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Devonshire v. Stubbs, New York County Courts1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API