Pullan v. Kinsinger
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
EMMONS. Circuit Judge.
The complainants, as they were required to do by section 6 of the act of July 20, 1808 (15 Stat. 126), gave notice that they would ferment seventy-two hours, and aver they actually employed all that time, but that the surveyors, in estimating the capacity of the distillery for purposes of taxation, unlawfully disregarded the period fixed in the notice, and assumed one of forty-eight hours only; that this resulted in their determining upon a false capacity, and provided for the assessor a fictitious basis of taxation. They aver that taxes have been paid in full upon all…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bloodgood v. Mohawk & Hudson RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Savacool v. BoughtonNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Sears v. CottrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
- Weaver v. DevendorfNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Mills v. MartinNew York Supreme Court · 1821
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Casco Co. v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Cinderella Theater Co. v. Sign Writers' Local Union No. 591District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1934
- CIC Services, LLC v. IRSCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019