Legal Opinion
Donohoe Construction Co. v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 29, 1975No. Civ. No. Y-74-1210PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*23MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
The plaintiff, complaining that the defendants have jointly promulgated zoning plans, ordinances, and building-permit decisions which have effected a taking of its North Park Avenue property in Bethesda, Maryland, seeks declaratory relief and an award of just compensation for the property allegedly taken. As originally filed, the plaintiff’s Complaint asserted that its cause of action arose directly under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution and that this Court had jurisdiction over the subject matter by virtue of 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pue v. SillasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- 6th Camden Corp. v. Evesham Tp., Burlington Cty.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1976
- Raffety v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1976
- Ligon v. State of Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1977
- Pue v. SillasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.