Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Commissioner of Administrative Services

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 28, 2004No. AC 24912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

Pursuant to General Statutes § 18-85 1 the state of Connecticut is authorized to assess inmates for the costs of their incarceration. To enforce this assessment, No. 01-129 of the 2001 Public Acts (now codified at § 18-85b 2 of the General Statutes), and § 18-85a-2 3 of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies authorize the state to place a lien on an inheritance received by an inmate. The principal issue in this case is whether, as applied under the circumstances of this case, the statute is unconstitutional because it violates an inmate’s right to equal protection of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. The Dartmouth Review, on Behalf of Its Officers, Staff and Subscribers v. Dartmouth CollegeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  5. Harmasse Leclair and Elizabeth Leclair, Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. William Saunders, Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tuchman v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. Justin LUND v. MILFORD HOSPITAL, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  3. In re Christina M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Lund v. Milford Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API