Legal Opinion
Fazon v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided August 16, 1996No. 94-502PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On June 28, 1996, the Court issued a memorandum decision affirming the May 13,1994, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) that the appellant was not eligible for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) non-service-connected pension benefits. The Court, citing section 402 of the Veterans’ Judicial Review Act (VJRA), also determined that it lacked jurisdiction to direct any action as to a claim for service connection of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) because no jurisdiction-conferring Notice of Disagreement (NOD) had been filed as to that claim. On July 10,1996, the…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Frankel v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Duro v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Pete T. Talon, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Florentino v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
- Talon v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
4Cited by2 opinions
- Crisanto v. Soria, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Dittrich v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998