Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 13, 1931No. 28,315PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying a new trial after verdict for plaintiff. The action is to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate caused by the wrongful act or negligence of defendant. Since the conclusion is reached that a new trial is unavoidable, no more of the facts and the trial need be stated than is deemed essential to bring out the point on which the decision is placed.

Emil Peterson, the plaintiff, was the husband of Della Peterson, deceased. On November 26, 1928, an automobile in which they were riding, the husband driving, collided with a meeting automobile operated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watson v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  2. Masek v. HedlundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Strite Governor Pulley Co. v. LyonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Craven v. SkobbaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Albrecht v. PotthoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Curtiss Collis v. Hildegarde Martz, as Trustee for the Surviving Spouse and Next-Of-Kin of Olivia Collis, DecedentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  4. State v. LeRoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. LeRoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API