Legal Opinion

Henry v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 13, 1975No. Civ. A. No. 74-1376PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GESELL, District Judge.

The motions for directed verdict in favor of the defendants made at the close of all the evidence were fully argued after the jury,* by a divided vote, failed to agree. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b). The controversy concerns the competency of an insured under a National Service Life Insurance policy to change the named beneficiary (Fulmer) to his estranged wife and court-appointed conservator (Bernice Henry). The motion is granted. Henry failed to meet her burden of proof.

The parties agreed to the following instruction which states the test of competency…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Price v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Baran v. HoszwaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1974
  3. Barbara L. Wilmoth v. United States June Wilmoth Haley Florence J. WilmothCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  4. Williams v. CanaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  5. Wilmoth v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kilburn v. Servicemen's Group Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API