Hadden v. Pierce
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Duckworth, Chief Justice.
Any citizen has such interest in having public officers perform their duties as will authorize him to maintain mandamus proceedings for that purpose. Code § 64-101. In such action, although the official duty required is that of issuing a building permit, it is not a private right of the petitioner requiring a showing of irreparable injury as required by Code § 64-105. A filling station is not a nuisance per se; and it appearing from all the evidence in this record that the only evidence offered in opposition to the application for the permit was of property owners…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. City of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Wofford Oil Co. v. City of CalhounSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- City of Hawkinsville v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- City of Pearson v. the Glidden Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1949
3Cited by4 opinions
- DeKalb County v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Moore v. Mayor &C. of StatesboroSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Pierce v. CullensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Barnes v. AustinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973