Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 22, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The Greater New York Charter (Laws of 1901, chap. 466, § 149, as amd. by Laws of 1917, chap. 401, and Laws of 1923, chap. 667; Id. § 261, as amd. by Laws of 1912, chap. 452) provides that one suing the city may not recover unless, after a notice provided for therein is served by the comptroller, an opportunity is given him to examine the claimant so that he may decide whether he will settle or adjust the claim.

At the trial of this case an assistant corporation counsel testified that, though properly served with such notice, plaintiff failed to appear for examination; that someone called him…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Winter v. . City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Harrington v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Casey v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Tolchinsky v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  5. Tolchinsky v. . the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Angelo v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1946
  2. Threat v. City of New YorkCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API