Legal Opinion
Fairfield Cty. Dog Warden v. Seifert
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 18, 2022No. 2021-CA-00038PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Fairfield Cty. Dog Warden v. Seifert,
2022-Ohio-2900.] COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFILED COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT FAIRFIELD CO. DOG WARDEN : JUDGES: : Hon. Earle E. Wise, Jr., P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. -vs- : : ANDREW SEIFERT : Case No. 2021-CA-00038 : Defendant-Appellant : OPINION CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal from the Municpal Court, Case No. 21 CVH 00665 JUDGMENT: Affirmed DATE OF JUDGMENT: August 18, 2022 APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff-Appellee For Defendant-Appellant THOMAS S. LININGER SCOTT P. WOOD 239 West Main…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Davis v. FlickingerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JamisonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tate v. Butler Cty. Dog WardenOhio Court of Appeals · 2024