Riley v. Nance
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the' Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This is an action to quiet title. The case was tried on an agreed statement of facts, as follows: In an action entitled H. v. W. and A., commenced May 4, 1888, the land in question, being that of W. and A., was attached and held until judgment in the case, November 12, 1888. May 19, 1888, W. and A. conveyed said land by deed to R. December 10, 1888, W. and A. appealed to this -court, giving the undertaking for said appeal and stay of execution. In July, 1889, said judgment was affirmed. September 16, 1889, said land was sold under execution, issued upon such judgment in attachment, to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Bagley v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Porter v. PicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- People ex rel. Ford v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by10 opinions
- Weinreich v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Bass v. StoddCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- MacGinniss Realty Co. v. HinderagerMontana Supreme Court · 1922
- Brun v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Belieu v. PowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.