Legal Opinion

Sumpter v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 1989No. 86-332PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACK,

Associate Judge:

This is an appeal from an order revoking appellant’s probation. The appellant, Kevin Sumpter, asserts that the trial court was without authority to take such action, as his probationary term had already expired. We agree and reverse.

I

On January 19, 1984, subsequent to a plea of guilty to unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, Sumpter was placed on probation for eighteen months under section 5010(a) of the Federal Youth Corrections Act.1 His probation was thus due to expire on July 18, 1985. While still on probation, however, Sumpter was arrested .in Maryland and entered an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Wright v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. SawickiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. State v. MortrudWashington Supreme Court · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hardy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In re M.O.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Neal v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Belcher v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. In re D.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API