Legal Opinion
United States v. Sanders
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 30, 1944No. 2931PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
Sanders instituted this action against the United States under Private Law 634, Part 2, 56 Stat. 1259.
The Private Law conferred jurisdiction upon the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma to hear, determine, and render judgment, without a jury, upon the claim of Sanders for damages allegedly sustained by him as a result of the injury and death of approximately 150 head of cattle, by reason of the alleged neglect of an inspector of the Bureau of Animal Industry, Department of Agriculture, in the dipping of such cattle for the elimination of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Robertson v. SichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Bigby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- German Bank of Memphis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Grannon v. Donk Bros. Coal & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bailey v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Finberg v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Fort Worth & Denver Railway Co. v. GoldschmidtDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- Bailey v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950