Legal Opinion

Parkinson v. Parkinson

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1990No. 19629PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying appellant’s motion to reduce child support arrearages to judgment. The district court’s ruling was based upon a finding that appellant impliedly waived her right to child support. For the reasons expressed below, we affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Debra Jo Parkinson (Debra) and Respondent Michael Richard Parkinson (Michael) were married in Las Vegas on January 11, 1978. On March 13, 1978, Michael adopted Gary, Debra’s son from a previous marriage. The couple had no other children. Debra and Michael were divorced by decree entered May…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mahban v. MGM Grand Hotels, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Kaminski v. KaminskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Kissinger v. KissingerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Napoleon v. NapoleonHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hildahl v. HildahlNevada Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rivero v. RiveroNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. McKellar v. McKellarNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Mason v. CuisenaireNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Merrill v. DeMottNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Westgate v. WestgateNevada Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API