Brugge v. Brugge
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in finding that an $80,000 interest in Marquardt’s Mobile Manor, which was transferred by plaintiff to defendant during the marriage, constitutes the separate property of defendant. Interspousal gifts made during the marriage constitute marital property subject to equitable distribution (see, Chase v Chase, 208 AD2d 883, 884; Foppiano v Foppiano, 166 AD2d 550, 551; Brown v Brown, 148 AD2d…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Feldman v. FeldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Woertler v. WoertlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Brown v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- McGarrity v. McGarrityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Chase v. ChaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Noble v. NobleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Ferina v. FerinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Anderson v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Campfield v. CampfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Campfield v. CampfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.