Legal Opinion

Peckham v. O'Hara

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mandamus. Application for mandamus to compel respondent to vacate an order setting aside an execution levy. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Relator sued out an execution upon a judgment which appears to have been in form against the estate of Isaac J. Hoag, deceased, and the writ was levied on lands which had belonged to the decedent. Upon application of the administratrix, Elizabeth A. Hoag, the levy was set aside, and the execution recalled. Relator asks for a mandamus to have the order of the circuit court vacated. The declaration is against Elizabeth A. Hoag individually, it sets up as cause of action specially the allowance of a claim of plaintiff against Isaac J. Hoag’s estate, and a failure by defendant to pay the claim as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peckham v. HoagMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lafferty v. People's Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Foreman Brothers Banking Co. v. HandyMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Lafferty v. People's Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API