Legal Opinion

Furniture Lease Co. v. Tidwell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1973PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUMPHREYS, Justice.

Furniture Lease Company, for the periods in question, was in the business of leasing furniture to individuals. This leasing was by written contract. Although there is no specification therefor in the lease contract used by Furniture, it required its lessees to deposit an amount equal to the monthly rental payment plus the next five dollar figure above this amount. This deposit was forfeited by Furniture if the lessee failed to pay the stipulated rent, or if the lessee converted or damaged the furniture. Approximately 75% of the amount deposited was applied to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Fisher Flouring Mills Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Sline Properties, Inc. v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  4. Klies v. LinnaneMontana Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nashville Golf & Athletic Club v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API