Legal Opinion

Lipinski v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 7, 1994No. 82, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES E. ORTH, Jr., Judge, Specially Assigned.

I

Robert Patrick Lipinski does not dispute that he killed Eugenia Courtalis. The State does not dispute that the judgment entered against Lipinski is flawed because the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, which found Lipinski guilty of murder in the first degree, gave a definition of “deliberate and premeditated” at odds with the meaning of that phrase as amplified by us in Willey v. State, 328 Md. 126, 613 A.2d 956 (1992), some nine months after Lipinski’s trial. 1 The question is what sanction is to be applied because of the trial court’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. State v. FryeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Lodowski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Hardy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Thornton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Montgomery Mutual Insurance v. ChessonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. State v. RoeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Southern v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API