Legal Opinion

International Standard Electric Corp. v. Ooms

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 28, 1946No. 9111-9113PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Associate Justice.

These appeals are from judgments of the District Court dismissing complaints under R.S. § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, to obtain patents. The Patent Office and District Court have held that the disclosures (descriptions) in appellant’s applications are not sufficient. The statute provides that “Before any inventor or discoverer shall receive a patent for his invention or discovery he * * * shall file in the Pat ent Office a written description of the same, and of the manner and process of making, constructing, compounding, and using it, in such full, clear, ■ concise,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. A. B. Dick Co. v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  4. Bullard Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. California Research Corporation v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  2. International Standard Electric Corp. v. KingslandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  3. Application of Paul J. Naquin, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  4. Texas Co. v. Globe Oil & Refining Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1953
  5. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BrennerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API