Legal Opinion
Thomas v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 21, 1988No. Civ. A. 84-3552-LFO, 87-1820-LFOPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiffs William Thomas, Ellen Thomas, Concepcion Picciotto, Robert Dor-rough, and others, individually and as organized, in various combinations, into the “White House Antinuclear Vigil” and the “Peace Park Anti-Nuclear Vigil” sue President Reagan, the Secretary of the Interior, and numerous Interior and Park Police officials for injuries allegedly arising out of plaintiffs’ communicative activities in Lafayette Park, Washington, D.C.
In 1984, plaintiffs filed suit against Department of the Interior officials challenging the constitutionality of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. William Thomas, United States of America v. Ellen ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- United States v. SempleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
- Ethics Commission v. KeatingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Ethics Commission v. KeatingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998