Legal Opinion

Walker v. City of Lynchburg

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 26, 1996No. 0226953PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIS, Judge.

On appeal from his conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, Norman Luther Walker contends the trial court erred in holding that the City of Lynchburg complied with the Virginia Implied Consent Law. We find no error and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

At 10:00 p.m. on April 22, 1994, Walker was operating a motor vehicle westward on Route 460 toward Lynchburg. A Lynchburg deputy observed the vehicle proceeding erratically and running on and off the shoulder of the road. The deputy was off-duty, so she called for another officer. Officer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Breeden v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  2. Mason v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  3. Driver v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lamay v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
  2. Danful Ray Herring v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. WalshMartinsville County Circuit Court · 2013
  4. Donna Lynn Taylor v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
  5. Walker v. City of LynchburgCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API