Baglin v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Motion by Defendant for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
At the close of the trial of this case, it was agreed by the parties that no questions called for submission to the jury. This agreement was equivalent to a request that the facts should be found by the court (Beuttell v. Magone, 157 U. S. 154, 15 Sup. Ct. 566, 39 L. Ed. 654), and, accordingly, what amounted to a provisional finding was made by directing a verdict for the plaintiff, while control over the whole subject was retained by following the excellent Pennsylvania practice and taking the verdict subject to the reserved question of law, whether there was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Guaranty Co. v. Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Atlantic Trust & Deposit Co. v. Town of LaurinburgCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1908
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bross v. McNicholasOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States ex rel. Griscom-Spencer Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- People ex rel. T. B. Townsend Brick & Contracting Co. v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- National Surety Co. v. Lincoln CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- Provident Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.